Re: [PATCH 3/3] t0000: drop "known breakage" test
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Dec 29, 2013, 07:22 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20131229072227.GB31788@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <20131228205104.GA5544@google.com>
On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 12:51:04PM -0800, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> Jeff King wrote: > > > I am not _that_ bothered by the "known breakage", but AFAICT there is > > zero benefit to keeping this redundant test. > > Devil's advocate: it ensures that anyone wrapping git's tests (like > the old smoketest infrastructure experiment) is able to handle an > expected failure.
Thanks. One of the things I love about open source is that as soon as I say "I can't see how...", the answer is crowd-sourced for me. :)
That being said, even if the test has a non-zero possible value...
> But in practice I don't mind the behavior before or after this patch. > If the test harness is that broken, we'll know. And people writing > code that wraps git's tests can write their own custom sanity-checks.
...I think for these reasons that the value is smaller than the disruption caused by the test, and the patch is a net win.
-Peff