Re: questions / suggestions about history simplification
- From
Adam Spiers <git@adamspiers.org>
- Date
- Dec 19, 2013, 20:46 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20131219204603.GI23496@pacific.linksys.moosehall>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqob4cefti.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 12:39:05PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> Adam Spiers <git@adamspiers.org> writes: > > > Ah OK, that makes sense now, but not the most intuitive choice of name > > IMHO. I would have gone for something like --all-commits, but I guess > > it's way too late to change now. > > Besides, it is not --all-commits, is it? We do cull irrelevant side > branches IIRC.
True, unless (IIUC) --full-history is also specified, in which case no commit chains are pruned from the walk.
So --all-walked-commits sounds about right.