Re: questions / suggestions about history simplification
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Dec 22, 2013, 06:44 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vr495jsf8.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20131219205858.GJ23496@pacific.linksys.moosehall>
Adam Spiers <git@adamspiers.org> writes:
Show 11 quoted lines
>> I doubt it. 75% of the work for such a person to understand the >> behaviour from such an example is to understand what kind of history >> the example is building. > > Agreed. And that's precisely why I wanted a real repository > manifesting the given example: being able to view it in gitk makes > that a lot easier to understand, for obvious reasons. > ... > Well I didn't roll my own; I just copied the example from the man > page. So it only tells you that I was spending a fair amount of > effort trying to understand the man page ;-)
Oh, that part I would agree, but then ...
Show 8 quoted lines
> Not if the man page says "if you wish to experiment with these options > yourself, you can easily recreate the repository in this example by > running the script contrib/foo bundled in the source distribution". > ... > The goal of sharing the series of commands is not to educate users > through reading them, but simply to save them the time they would have > to spend manually recreating the example scenario given in the man > page.
... this part could be even easier if distro ships a sample repository, not a recipe to create such a sample repository, no?