From: Adam Spiers <git@adamspiers.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 20:46:03 GMT
Subject: Re: questions / suggestions about history simplification
Message-ID: <20131219204603.GI23496@pacific.linksys.moosehall>
In-Reply-To: <xmqqob4cefti.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>

On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 12:39:05PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Adam Spiers <git@adamspiers.org> writes:
> 
> > Ah OK, that makes sense now, but not the most intuitive choice of name
> > IMHO.  I would have gone for something like --all-commits, but I guess
> > it's way too late to change now.
> 
> Besides, it is not --all-commits, is it?  We do cull irrelevant side
> branches IIRC.

True, unless (IIUC) --full-history is also specified, in which case no
commit chains are pruned from the walk.

So --all-walked-commits sounds about right.