Re: [PATCH 03/16] pull: cleanup documentation
- From
David Aguilar <davvid@gmail.com>
- Date
- Oct 31, 2013, 23:40 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20131031234048.GA41400@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAMP44s14_GbN0nEm4Eu2Jdb5cO+jVaTVOnDqzwv0GK4_jfD93w@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 03:16:57PM -0600, Felipe Contreras wrote:
Show 13 quoted lines
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote: > > Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes: > > > The other reason the original did not say "origin/master" is because > > this holds true even if you do not have such a remote-tracking > > branch for the master at the origin, but the illustration that shows > > the history after "git pull" finishes spells remotes/origin/master > > out, so I think it would be an improvement to make the two pictures > > consistent by drawing where the origin/master is before this "git > > pull" is run. > > So you care about "reality" when it fits your argument, but not when > it doesn't. Got it.
What exactly do these flippant remarks accomplish? Keep these to yourself. No one deserves this treatment nor does anyone care to read it.
-- David