Re: [PATCH 2/2] Don't close pack fd when free'ing pack windows
- From
Fredrik Gustafsson <iveqy@iveqy.com>
- Date
- Jul 31, 2013, 21:21 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20130731212114.GG19369@paksenarrion.iveqy.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CALWbr2wR2cN8dcOtW2bV3p7FC3ymdXgfp61A4pNKvOWhP6WU_Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 11:08:21PM +0200, Antoine Pelisse wrote:
Show 11 quoted lines
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 9:51 PM, Brandon Casey <bcasey@nvidia.com> wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain > > confidential information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution > > is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by > > reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > I'm certainly not a lawyer, and I'm sorry for not reviewing the > content of the patch instead, but is that not a problem from a legal > point of view ?
Talking about legal, is it a problem if a commit isn't signed-off by it's committer or author e-mail? Like in this case where the sign-off is from gmail.com and the committer from nvidia.com?
-- Med vänliga hälsningar Fredrik Gustafsson tel: 0733-608274 e-post: iveqy@iveqy.com