git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: Git.pm with recent File::Temp fail

From
H.Merijn Brand <h.m.brand@xs4all.nl>
Date
Apr 29, 2013, 05:46 UTC
Message-ID
<20130429074620.17fbf129@pc09.procura.nl>
In-Reply-To
<7vr4hung17.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 20:59:16 -0700, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:

Show 28 quoted lines
> Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> 
> > On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 11:09:33AM +0200, H.Merijn Brand wrote:
> >
> >> Still failing in 1.8.2.2
> >> 
> >> Short fix:
> >> --8<---
> >> diff --git a/perl/Git.pm b/perl/Git.pm
> >> index dc48159..7a252ef 100644
> >> --- a/perl/Git.pm
> >> +++ b/perl/Git.pm
> >> @@ -1265,7 +1265,7 @@ sub _temp_cache {
> >>                         $tmpdir = $self->repo_path();
> >>                 }
> >> 
> >> -               ($$temp_fd, $fname) = File::Temp->tempfile(
> >> +               ($$temp_fd, $fname) = File::Temp::tempfile(
> >>                         'Git_XXXXXX', UNLINK => 1, DIR => $tmpdir,
> >>                         ) or throw Error::Simple("couldn't open new temp file");
> >
> > I think this fix is the right thing. Your patch probably didn't get
> > applied because it did not follow the guidelines in SubmittingPatches.
> 
> It was more like "It managed to miss people's attention because the
> subject didn't say [PATCH]", but yes you are right that the change
> the patch text itself shows looks reasonable and that I cannot apply
> a patch that is not signed off (and worse yet in multipart/mixed).

My first attempt (when git-1.8.2 was released) had the patch attached and the reply was

On Sat, 23 Mar 2013 16:32:47 +0000, Ben Walton <bdwalton@gmail.com> wrote:

Show 6 quoted lines
> This list prefers patches to be inline so that they can easily be
> commented on, etc.  I took a quick look at your patch and while it
> looks fine to me, fwiw.
> 
> You may want to resubmit using git send-email though so that others
> will look at it and possibly apply it.

So I retried inlining. No mention about *how* to inline or that the subject should have the word "PATCH".

I don't need any credits. I just want git to work from scratch :)
Show 12 quoted lines
> > ...
> > So I think the right commit message is something like:
> >
> >   We call File::Temp's "tempfile" function as a class method, but it was
> >   never designed to be called this way. Older versions seemed to
> >   tolerate it, but as of File::Temp 0.23, it blows up like this:
> >
> >     $ git svn fetch
> >     'tempfile' can't be called as a method at .../Git.pm line 1117.
> >
> >   Fix it by calling it as a regular function, just inside the File::Temp
> >   namespace.
Sounds about right.
> > -Peff
> 
> Thanks.
-- 
H.Merijn Brand  http://tux.nl   Perl Monger  http://amsterdam.pm.org/
using perl5.00307 .. 5.17   porting perl5 on HP-UX, AIX, and openSUSE
http://mirrors.develooper.com/hpux/        http://www.test-smoke.org/
http://qa.perl.org   http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/
Previous: Junio C HamanoNext: Junio C Hamano
Message 6 of 9 in “Git.pm with recent File::Temp fail”
  1. H.Merijn BrandMar 22, 2013
  2. H.Merijn BrandApr 8, 2013
  3. H.Merijn BrandApr 28, 2013
  4. Jeff KingApr 29, 2013
  5. Junio C HamanoApr 29, 2013
  6. H.Merijn BrandApr 29, 2013
  7. Junio C HamanoApr 29, 2013
  8. Junio C HamanoApr 29, 2013
  9. H.Merijn BrandApr 29, 2013

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.