Re: [PATCH 0/3] Fix installation paths with "make install-doc"

> Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> > John Keeping wrote:
> >
> >>   Documentation/Makefile: fix inherited {html,info,man}dir
> >
> > This doesn't seem to have hit the list.
> 
> More importantly, 
> 
> >> When using the top-level install-doc target the html, info and man
> >> target directories are inherited from the top-level Makefile by the
> >> documentation Makefile as relative paths, which is not expected and
> >> results in the files being installed in an unexpected location.
> 
> I am not sure what problem it is trying to address.  During every
> cycle "make doc && make install-man install-html" is run for all
> integration branches and it didn't cause any problems.
> 
> A wild guess.  John, are you using config.mak.autogen?

> I _think_ exporting mandir/html/infodir from the top-level Makefile
> is wrong to begin with.  We should drop the "export mandir" from
> there.
> 
> Giving them unusual meaning (e.g. "mandir = share/man") is already
> bad and that needs to be fixed by limiting this "oh, on some
> platforms we compile-in GIT_MAN_PATH as a relative path to an
> unspecified place" insanity only to where -DGIT_MAN_PATH=<path> is
> defined.  The path used there does not help the building and
> installation of the documentation at all, so the variable used for
> the purpose of giving that <path> should not be named the same way
> as the variable used on Documentation/Makefile to name the real path
> in the first place.
> 
> Perhaps rename these to runtime_{man,html,info}dir or something and
> make sure {man,html,info}dir are defined as the real paths whose
> default values begin with $(prefix)?