Re: [RFC/PATCH 2/4] cat-file: do not die on --textconv without textconv filters
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Feb 6, 2013, 22:19 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20130206221912.GD27507@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <b20e91bc71e59b5390005f2e6428e69a467e80b5.1360162813.git.git@drmicha.warpmail.net>
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 04:08:51PM +0100, Michael J Gruber wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> When a command is supposed to use textconv filters (by default or with > "--textconv") and none are configured then the blob is output without > conversion; the only exception to this rule is "cat-file --textconv". > > Make it behave like the rest of textconv aware commands.
Makes sense.
Show 6 quoted lines
> - if (!textconv_object(obj_context.path, obj_context.mode, sha1, 1, &buf, &size))
> - die("git cat-file --textconv: unable to run textconv on %s",
> - obj_name);
> - break;
> + if (textconv_object(obj_context.path, obj_context.mode, sha1, 1, &buf, &size))
> + break;The implication here is that textconv_object should be handling its own errors and dying, and the return is always "yes, I converted" or "no, I did not". Which I think is the case.
Show 6 quoted lines
> +
> + /* otherwise expect a blob */
> + exp_type = "blob";
>
> case 0:
> if (type_from_string(exp_type) == OBJ_BLOB) {I wondered at first why we needed to set exp_type here; shouldn't we already be expecting a blob if we are doing textconv? But then I see this is really about the fall-through in the switch (which we might want an explicit comment for).
Which made me wonder: what happens with:
git cat-file --textconv HEAD
It looks like we die just before textconv-ing, because we have no obj_context.path. But that is also unlike all of the other --textconv switches, which mean "turn on textconv if you are showing a blob that supports it" and not "the specific operation is --textconv, apply it to this blob". I don't know if that is worth changing or not.
-Peff