Re: [PATCH] Replace git-cvsimport with a rewrite that fixes major bugs.
- From
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jan 2, 2013, 15:39 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20130102153933.GA30813@elie.Belkin>
- In-Reply-To
- <20130102105919.GA14391@thyrsus.com>
Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>:
Show 8 quoted lines
>> Speaking with my Debian packager hat on: the updated cvsps is not >> available in Debian. "git cvsimport" is, and it has users that report >> bugs from time to time. With this change, I would either have to take >> on responsibility for maintenance of the cvsps package (not going to >> happen) or drop "git cvsimport". That's a serious regression. > > How does going from "it silently damages imports" to "it fails with > an error message" constitute a regression?
The former is already loudly advertised in the package description and manpage, at least lets you get work done, and works fine for simple repositories with linear history.
Taking away a command that people have been using in everyday work is pretty much a textbook example of a regression, no?
Hope that helps, Jonathan