Re: Millisecond precision in timestamps?
- From
Eric S. Raymond <esr@thyrsus.com>
- Date
- Nov 27, 2012, 23:04 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20121127230419.GA26080@thyrsus.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vzk22lmz9.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>:
> fsck_ident() in fsck.c rejects anything but " [1-9][0-9]* " after > the author and committer ident (i.e. the timestamp has to be > integral number of seconds since the epoch, not before it, nor > with fractional seconds).
Is this architecturally significant? It sounds like another implementation detail.
-- <a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>