From: Eric S. Raymond <esr@thyrsus.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 23:04:19 GMT
Subject: Re: Millisecond precision in timestamps?
Message-ID: <20121127230419.GA26080@thyrsus.com>
In-Reply-To: <7vzk22lmz9.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>:
> fsck_ident() in fsck.c rejects anything but " [1-9][0-9]* " after
> the author and committer ident (i.e. the timestamp has to be
> integral number of seconds since the epoch, not before it, nor
> with fractional seconds).

Is this architecturally significant?  It sounds like another
implementation detail.
-- 
		<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>