Re: Millisecond precision in timestamps?
- From
Shawn Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
- Date
- Nov 27, 2012, 23:49 UTC
- Message-ID
- <CAJo=hJtOqRHcjWH1F71Qc5zvPkUAe+u1RrcC2pt_xQwLSUY0yg@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20121127230419.GA26080@thyrsus.com>
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Eric S. Raymond <esr@thyrsus.com> wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>: >> fsck_ident() in fsck.c rejects anything but " [1-9][0-9]* " after >> the author and committer ident (i.e. the timestamp has to be >> integral number of seconds since the epoch, not before it, nor >> with fractional seconds). > > Is this architecturally significant? It sounds like another > implementation detail.
Well... if we added a fractional seconds to a commit, older versions of Git will scream loudly and refuse to work with the new commit. That would create a fork of Git.