Re: [PATCHv2] fetch: Only call a new ref a "branch" if it's under refs/heads/.
- From
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
- Date
- Apr 16, 2012, 16:08 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20120416160850.GN5813@burratino>
- In-Reply-To
- <20120416150036.GA15009@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Jeff King wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 10:58:21AM -0400, Marc Branchaud wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
>> Git is better off describing what's appeared in the remote repo, and not >> worrying about describing how the user might've mapped those things to local >> refs. > > That's my preference, as well, so it sounds like you, Junio, and I are > all in agreement.
My preference after reading Junio's message was "[new] ", for what it's worth.