From: Jonathan Nieder Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 16:08:50 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] fetch: Only call a new ref a "branch" if it's under refs/heads/. Message-ID: <20120416160850.GN5813@burratino> In-Reply-To: <20120416150036.GA15009@sigill.intra.peff.net> Jeff King wrote: > On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 10:58:21AM -0400, Marc Branchaud wrote: >> Git is better off describing what's appeared in the remote repo, and not >> worrying about describing how the user might've mapped those things to local >> refs. > > That's my preference, as well, so it sounds like you, Junio, and I are > all in agreement. My preference after reading Junio's message was "[new] ", for what it's worth.