Re: [PATCHv3] fetch: Use the remote's ref name to decide how to describe new refs.
- From
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
- Date
- Apr 16, 2012, 16:10 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20120416161048.GO5813@burratino>
- In-Reply-To
- <1334591542-25136-1-git-send-email-marcnarc@xiplink.com>
marcnarc@xiplink.com wrote:
> Also, only call a new ref a "branch" if it's under refs/heads/.
Looks good (though I haven't tested it). Perhaps some new tests would help make sure this doesn't get broken in the future.