Re: [PATCH] archive: fix archive generation for empty trees
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Mar 8, 2012, 07:15 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20120308071559.GF7643@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vpqcnfvhs.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 10:38:07PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> > ... However, prefix_pathspec does a lot of magic parsing; > > it's unclear to me whether this is all in support of properly > > adding the prefix, or if its side effects are important. > > These "magic" are for things like :(root)/path that will explicitly > refuse the prefix when run from a subdirectory.
Yeah, that was my impression. In that case, I would think we could get rid of the get_pathspec call entirely, as it is purely about fixing-up prefixes, and we know that we have none.
-Peff