From: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:21:28 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] test: tests for the "double > from mailmap" bug
Message-ID: <20120214222128.GA24544@burratino>
In-Reply-To: <CAMP44s1mV2cE=R49qYSLd8eZPhCpRx0hRnnG_-K3iBxp_YQEpQ@mail.gmail.com>

Felipe Contreras wrote:

> The difference of opinion is that I consider the patch already good
> enough (adding the comments from Junio).

Ok, I can understand where you're coming from there.

Now I have offered some suggestions for improving some of your
patches.  Applying these suggestions would be effortless, since I sent
them in patch form.  What is your response?  You send a point-by-point
rebuttal explaining how each detail of my suggestions is bad, bad,
bad, and then resend the original with comparatively small changes.

Can you see how this might indicate a stronger difference of opinion
than you have mentioned?  And how a reviewer might make the mistake of
thinking his comments were unwelcome after such an experience?