Re: [PATCH v2] Use correct grammar in diffstat summary line
- From
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
- Date
- Feb 1, 2012, 23:35 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20120201233515.GC29599@burratino>
- In-Reply-To
- <1328100907-20397-1-git-send-email-pclouds@gmail.com>
(dropping Thomas from cc) Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
> And this patch's diffstat looks just scary due to test suite's updates.
Not about this patch, but: let's see if we can chisel away at that.
Hidden below are also two minor bug reports about the patch. See (*) and (**) below.
Show 9 quoted lines
> --- a/t/t0023-crlf-am.sh > +++ b/t/t0023-crlf-am.sh > @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Subject: test1 > > --- > foo | 1 + > - 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > create mode 100644 foo
This patchfile is sample input to "git am", and this patch hunk changes it to match the modified format-patch output format. But don't we want "git am" to work with old patches, too? So this hunk is unnecessary.
[...]
Show 9 quoted lines
> --- a/t/t1200-tutorial.sh > +++ b/t/t1200-tutorial.sh > @@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ Updating VARIABLE..VARIABLE > FASTFORWARD (no commit created; -m option ignored) > example | 1 + > hello | 1 + > - 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > + 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+) > EOF
Yes, this one's necessary.
(*) It's reminding us to update the gitcore-tutorial. :)
[...]
Show 10 quoted lines
> --- a/t/t3300-funny-names.sh > +++ b/t/t3300-funny-names.sh > @@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ test_expect_success TABS_IN_FILENAMES 'git diff-tree delete with-funny' \ > test_expect_success TABS_IN_FILENAMES 'setup expect' ' > cat >expected <<\EOF > "tabs\t,\" (dq) and spaces" > - 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > + 1 file changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > EOF > '
I'm not sure why this and other tests in the same file use "git apply --stat" to check their work. The descriptions refer to diff-tree but the tests themselves use diff-index | apply --stat. Puzzling.
[...]
Show 17 quoted lines
> --- a/t/t3508-cherry-pick-many-commits.sh > +++ b/t/t3508-cherry-pick-many-commits.sh > @@ -38,13 +38,13 @@ test_expect_success 'cherry-pick first..fourth works' ' > cat <<-\EOF >expected && > [master OBJID] second > Author: A U Thor <author@example.com> > - 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > [master OBJID] third > Author: A U Thor <author@example.com> > - 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > [master OBJID] fourth > Author: A U Thor <author@example.com> > - 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > EOF
Probably should be split out as a separate test so cherry-pick's behavior and progress reporting can be tested separately. Aside from that detail, makes sense.
[...]
Show 8 quoted lines
> --- a/t/t3903-stash.sh > +++ b/t/t3903-stash.sh > @@ -444,7 +444,7 @@ test_expect_success 'stash show - stashes on stack, stash-like argument' ' > git reset --hard && > cat >expected <<-EOF && > file | 1 + > - 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
Hm. "git stash show" defaults to --stat, but these tests are not really about that. Maybe there should be one test that checks that the default uses --stat and others could use --numstat or similar?
This will be a problem with GETTEXT_POISON (except your patch bypasses poison so it got missed --- will send a relevant fix as a reply).
[...]
> +++ b/t/t4013/diff.diff-tree_--cc_--patch-with-stat_--summary_master > +++ b/t/t4013/diff.diff-tree_--cc_--patch-with-stat_--summary_side > +++ b/t/t4013/diff.diff-tree_--cc_--patch-with-stat_master > +++ b/t/t4013/diff.diff-tree_--cc_--stat_--summary_master
[...]
> +++ b/t/t4013/diff.format-patch_--attach_--stdout_initial..side > +++ b/t/t4013/diff.format-patch_--inline_--stdout_--numbered-files_initial..master > +++ b/t/t4013/diff.format-patch_--inline_--stdout_--subject-prefix=TESTCASE_initial..master
[...]
Testing the --stat option. Can't really be avoided. (Though maybe some more modular tests for these combinations can be made some day.)
[...]
Show 8 quoted lines
> --- a/t/t4014-format-patch.sh > +++ b/t/t4014-format-patch.sh > @@ -520,7 +520,7 @@ test_expect_success 'shortlog of cover-letter wraps overly-long onelines' ' > cat > expect << EOF > --- > file | 16 ++++++++++++++++ > - 1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > + 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
Not relevant to the detail being tested, should probably be fuzzed out.
[...]
Show 11 quoted lines
> --- a/t/t4030-diff-textconv.sh > +++ b/t/t4030-diff-textconv.sh > @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ test_expect_success 'status -v produces text' ' > > cat >expect.stat <<'EOF' > file | Bin 2 -> 4 bytes > - 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > + 1 file changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > EOF > test_expect_success 'diffstat does not run textconv' ' > echo file diff=fail >.gitattributes &&
Testing diffstat. Would be nice to have an accompanying test of numstat.
[...]
Show 9 quoted lines
> --- a/t/t4045-diff-relative.sh
> +++ b/t/t4045-diff-relative.sh
> @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ check_stat() {
> expect=$1; shift
> cat >expected <<EOF
> $expect | 1 +
> - 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> EOFNot the detail being tested, so technically it would be nicer to fuzz the last line out.
[...]
Show 11 quoted lines
> --- a/t/t4049-diff-stat-count.sh > +++ b/t/t4049-diff-stat-count.sh > @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ test_expect_success setup ' > cat >expect <<-\EOF > a | 1 + > b | 1 + > - 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > + 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+) > EOF > git diff --stat --stat-count=2 >actual && > test_cmp expect actual
Testing diffstat. Looks sane.
[...]
Show 5 quoted lines
> +++ b/t/t4100/t-apply-8.expect > @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ > t/t4100-apply-stat.sh | 2 +- > - 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
[...]
Show 5 quoted lines
> +++ b/t/t4100/t-apply-9.expect > @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ > t/t4100-apply-stat.sh | 2 +- > - 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Testing apply --stat. Tests of apply --numstat would be more interesting, but then we'd still need some tests like these to make sure --stat is consistent with it, so it still seems sane.
Show 8 quoted lines
> --- a/t/t5150-request-pull.sh
> +++ b/t/t5150-request-pull.sh
> @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ test_expect_success 'setup: two scripts for reading pull requests' '
> b
> : diffstat
> n
> - / [0-9]* files changed/ {
> + / [0-9]* files\? changed/ {Mimicking a human.
(**) Should probably use "*" instead of \? --- \? is a GNU extension, not a BRE.
[...]
Show 10 quoted lines
> +++ b/t/t7602-merge-octopus-many.sh > @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ Merge made by the 'octopus' strategy. > c2.c | 1 + > c3.c | 1 + > c4.c | 1 + > - 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > + 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 c2.c > create mode 100644 c3.c > create mode 100644 c4.c
Test is about the "Trying simple merge with" lines, not the final diffstat summary. Should probably be fuzzed out.
Thanks, that was interesting.
Jonathan