Re: [PATCHv4 2/4] Add infrastructure for ref namespaces
- From
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jun 9, 2011, 09:09 UTC
- Message-ID
- <201106091109.01168.jnareb@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20110609033817.GB6167@leaf>
On Thu, 9 Jun 2011, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 11:41:25AM +0200, Jakub Narebski wrote:
> > BTW. what do you think about treating repository with own refs and with
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Show 6 quoted lines
> > namespaces similarly to how "forks" are handled in gitweb now? > > Different namespaces won't necessarily represent forks of the same > repository; they may represent entirely separate repositories, with the > use of namespaces merely a server-side implementation detail to save > space. I'd suggest presenting them as separate repositories.
What I wanted to say that if repository with namespaces has its own not namespaced refs, then (sub)namespaces are probably forks, and "forks"-like behavior would be a good idea.
If namespaced repository serves only to save space, then it wouldn't have its own refs, only namespaced ones. Then we would list them as separate repositories.
-- Jakub Narebski Poland