From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Date: Wed, 04 May 2011 21:28:48 GMT
Subject: Re: [RFC] require-work-tree wants more than what its name says
Message-ID: <20110504212848.GA27779@sigill.intra.peff.net>
In-Reply-To: <7vliymfp4t.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 08:42:58AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> 
> > ... but I worry about compatibility. We can audit our in-tree scripts,
> > but git-sh-setup is part of the recommended API for external scripts,
> > no?
> 
> I am Ok with renaming the thing to "require_work_tree_exists", and all the
> worry will go away.

Yeah, that seems like a fine solution to me.

-Peff