Re: [PATCH 1/4] teach wait_or_whine a "quiet" mode
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Apr 1, 2011, 01:35 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20110401013519.GB21036@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <201103312256.39317.j6t@kdbg.org>
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 10:56:39PM +0200, Johannes Sixt wrote:
Show 16 quoted lines
> On Donnerstag, 31. März 2011, Jeff King wrote: > > The wait_or_whine function will complain to stderr in a few > > cases: > > > > 1. We fail to actually waitpid() correctly. > > > > 2. The child died of a signal. > > > > 3. The child returned exit code 127, indicating a missing > > command to exec after forking. > > > > We already have a silent_exec_failure flag to silence (3). > > Let's convert that into a "quiet" flag to also silence (2). > > I'm rather negative on controlling these two error reports with the same flag > because...
Fair enough. We can add an extra flag, then, or just drop both patches entirely. They are just trying to save the "child process killed" message when we abort a separate-process async.
-Peff