Re: Re: [PATCH v3 3/8] mingw: make failures to unlink or move raise a question
- From
Heiko Voigt <hvoigt@hvoigt.net>
- Date
- Dec 15, 2010, 07:28 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20101215072803.GA14646@book.hvoigt.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <7v1v5jrb1f.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 07:05:00PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 23 quoted lines
> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes: > > >> > @@ -129,6 +130,78 @@ static inline int is_file_in_use_error(DWORD errcode) > >> > return 0; > >> > } > >> > > >> > +static int read_yes_no_answer() > >> > >> Perhaps "static int read_yes_no_answer(void)" for portability? > > > > LOL. This file is called compat/mingw.c... :-) > > I had the same reaction. Maybe MinGW will get a different compiler > someday ;-) > > > But I have no objection to stay with the convention of the rest of Git. > > Nobody needs to convince me that consistency is good. > > I recall there are a few old-style declaration in compat/ directory, > especially in borrowed code like nedmalloc/ and possibly regex/, and > I am not so sure if we want to touch them. > > I'll leave this up to msysgit folks.
I do not mind changing this sincce I need to change this patch anyway. Will do in the next iteration.
Cheers Heiko