Re: [PATCH 00/11 v4] More consistant terminology
- From
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
- Date
- Oct 30, 2010, 06:58 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20101030065844.GB30613@burratino>
- In-Reply-To
- <1288411819-24462-1-git-send-email-Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr>
Matthieu Moy wrote:
Show 16 quoted lines
> Jonathan Nieder (1): > user-manual: remote-tracking can be checked out, with detached HEAD > > Matthieu Moy (10): > Better "Changed but not updated" message in git-status > Replace "remote tracking" with "remote-tracking" > Change remote tracking to remote-tracking in non-trivial places > everyday.txt: change "tracking branch" to "remote-tracking branch" > Change "tracking branch" to "remote-tracking branch" > Change incorrect uses of "remote branch" meaning "remote-tracking" > Change incorrect "remote branch" to "remote tracking branch" in C > code > Use 'remote-tracking branch' in generated merge messages > user-manual.txt: explain better the remote(-tracking) branch terms > git-branch.txt: mention --set-upstream as a way to change upstream > configuration
Acked-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Sorry to draw this out so (and thanks for your work!).
IMHO patches 7 and 8 should be squashed to avoid breaking the fetch/fmt-merge-msg interface, but there is no need to resend again to make that happen.