From: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 06:58:44 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11 v4] More consistant terminology
Message-ID: <20101030065844.GB30613@burratino>
In-Reply-To: <1288411819-24462-1-git-send-email-Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr>

Matthieu Moy wrote:

> Jonathan Nieder (1):
>   user-manual: remote-tracking can be checked out, with detached HEAD
> 
> Matthieu Moy (10):
>   Better "Changed but not updated" message in git-status
>   Replace "remote tracking" with "remote-tracking"
>   Change remote tracking to remote-tracking in non-trivial places
>   everyday.txt: change "tracking branch" to "remote-tracking branch"
>   Change "tracking branch" to "remote-tracking branch"
>   Change incorrect uses of "remote branch" meaning "remote-tracking"
>   Change incorrect "remote branch" to "remote tracking branch" in C
>     code
>   Use 'remote-tracking branch' in generated merge messages
>   user-manual.txt: explain better the remote(-tracking) branch terms
>   git-branch.txt: mention --set-upstream as a way to change upstream
>     configuration

Acked-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Sorry to draw this out so (and thanks for your work!).

IMHO patches 7 and 8 should be squashed to avoid breaking the
fetch/fmt-merge-msg interface, but there is no need to resend again
to make that happen.