Re: [PATCH 03/10] Change remote tracking to remote-tracking in non-trivial places

From: Drew Northup <drew.northup@maine.edu>
Date: Oct 29, 2010, 17:26 UTC
Message-ID: <1288373206.5748.16.camel@drew-northup.unet.maine.edu>
In-Reply-To: <vpqk4l2djqc.fsf@bauges.imag.fr>

On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 00:40 +0200, Matthieu Moy wrote:

Show 19 quoted lines

> Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> > Matthieu Moy wrote:
> >
> >> What I'm trying to do here is really to achieve consistancy. If
> >> something has a name, let's use the same name everywhere.
> >
> > Okay, but can it at least not be part of a patch that does something
> > simpler (only adding dashes)?
> 
> OK, I'll do that.
> 
> > I'm not sure why you don't like the idea of rewording it, but
> > that's fine ---
> 
> Not that I don't like the idea. I'm just saying that my patch makes
> the situation better that it used to. No objection if other people
> want to make it even better later (but I probably won't have time
> soon).

I was contemplating taking some time to look more closely at this document myself. This patch does not get in the way of my doing so.

-- 
-Drew Northup N1XIM
   AKA RvnPhnx on OPN
________________________________________________
"As opposed to vegetable or mineral error?"
-John Pescatore, SANS NewsBites Vol. 12 Num. 59