Re: [PATCH 1/3] test-lib: tests can have multiple prerequisites
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Apr 26, 2010, 19:17 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20100426191703.GC10772@coredump.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <20100421133806.GA5595@progeny.tock>
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 08:38:06AM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> Alas, I didn’t notice the thread with the almost identical patch [1] > before writing this one. > > Since I am painting it, I prefer this way. I find it intuitive and > can’t really see where the fuss about using some other coding style > came from. So I would be very happy if someone who does understand > the fuss could come up with a comment to add to the commit message > about this. :)
I liked commas better, but since you are doing the work of writing the patches, I will let it go. :)
I do wonder if it might be less error-prone to have:
test_expect_success PREREQ1 PREREQ2 'desc' 'test'
instead of
test_expect_success 'PREREQ1 PREREQ2' 'desc' 'test'
which should just be something like
while test $# -gt 2; do
test_have_prereq "$1" || skip=t
shift
doneBut if you think that's dumb, just ignore it. It is really not worth spending that much time on.
-Peff