Re: git fetch -v not at all verbose?

From: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Date: Jan 21, 2010, 16:35 UTC
Message-ID: <20100121163518.GA16466@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20100121161858.GC19078@spearce.org>

On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 08:18:58AM -0800, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:

Show 26 quoted lines

> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On many of my trees (with linux kernel), git fetch is slower than git clone.
> > Even more annoyingly, it would hang sometimes for tens of minutes without any
> > output, even if -v is supplied.
> 
> Ouch.  I think -v -v boosts the output to be ever more verbose,
> and might actually show you something.
>  
> > stracing it shows a ton of lines like the following:
> > 16324 read(10, "ACK 4bbdfe65d23014f539fec4227260"..., 51) = 51
> > 16324 read(10, "0037", 4)               = 4
> > 16324 read(10, "ACK 322c06560fa314b04a6302ea03c0"..., 51) = 51
> > 16324 read(10, "0037", 4)               = 4
> > 16324 read(10, "ACK 848ea2043b128b5947851866a114"..., 51) = 51
> > 16324 read(10, "0037", 4)               = 4
> 
> That's the peers trying to determine a common base.
>  
> > Is there some way to make got fetch show progress at this stage,
> > or even better, can it be made faster somehow?
> 
> We shouldn't need to show progress here, we should just be faster.
> 
> Given the symptom, it sounds to me like your local repository
> is some 1,000s of commits ahead of the remote repository you are
> fetching from.  Is that true?

Hmm, no, but what is true is that I fetched several remotes that diverged significantly into the same local repository. Would that have same effect?

> Are you fetching from a configured remote that has tracking branches,
> or are you fetching through a one-shot URL pasted onto the command
> line?

Configured remote.

> -- 
> Shawn.