Re: [PATCH v3.1 3/5] Introduce new pretty formats %g[sdD] for reflog information

> On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 04:48:11PM +0200, Thomas Rast wrote:
>
>> > +NOTE: Some placeholders may depend on other options given to the
>> > +revision traversal engine. For example, the `%g*` reflog options will
>> > +insert an empty string unless we are traversing reflog entries (e.g., by
>> > +`git log -g`). The `%d` placeholder will use the "short" decoration
>> > +format if `--decorate` was not already provided on the command line.
>> 
>> Sure.  I figured it was obvious enough, but since you already went to
>> the lengths of documenting the exact behaviour of %d, I squashed it
>> and adjusted the acknowledgement in the commit message accordingly.
>
> If the consensus (or Junio's decision when applying) is that we don't
> need it, I don't mind if my suggestion is scrapped (or reworded).