Re: [PATCH v3.1 3/5] Introduce new pretty formats %g[sdD] for reflog information
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Oct 18, 2009, 07:18 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20091018071829.GA7748@coredump.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <e0ab6923eb4057bcbc8e97980dad5e4a37e53067.1255790816.git.trast@student.ethz.ch>
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 04:48:11PM +0200, Thomas Rast wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> > +NOTE: Some placeholders may depend on other options given to the > > +revision traversal engine. For example, the `%g*` reflog options will > > +insert an empty string unless we are traversing reflog entries (e.g., by > > +`git log -g`). The `%d` placeholder will use the "short" decoration > > +format if `--decorate` was not already provided on the command line. > > Sure. I figured it was obvious enough, but since you already went to > the lengths of documenting the exact behaviour of %d, I squashed it > and adjusted the acknowledgement in the commit message accordingly.
If the consensus (or Junio's decision when applying) is that we don't need it, I don't mind if my suggestion is scrapped (or reworded).
-Peff