From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 07:18:29 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3.1 3/5] Introduce new pretty formats %g[sdD] for reflog information
Message-ID: <20091018071829.GA7748@coredump.intra.peff.net>
In-Reply-To: <e0ab6923eb4057bcbc8e97980dad5e4a37e53067.1255790816.git.trast@student.ethz.ch>

On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 04:48:11PM +0200, Thomas Rast wrote:

> > +NOTE: Some placeholders may depend on other options given to the
> > +revision traversal engine. For example, the `%g*` reflog options will
> > +insert an empty string unless we are traversing reflog entries (e.g., by
> > +`git log -g`). The `%d` placeholder will use the "short" decoration
> > +format if `--decorate` was not already provided on the command line.
> 
> Sure.  I figured it was obvious enough, but since you already went to
> the lengths of documenting the exact behaviour of %d, I squashed it
> and adjusted the acknowledgement in the commit message accordingly.

If the consensus (or Junio's decision when applying) is that we don't
need it, I don't mind if my suggestion is scrapped (or reworded).

-Peff