Re: [PATCH] send-email: Refuse to send cover-letter template subject
- From
Markus Heidelberg <markus.heidelberg@web.de>
- Date
- Jun 9, 2009, 19:32 UTC
- Message-ID
- <200906092132.10256.markus.heidelberg@web.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <7v4oupmdv5.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Junio C Hamano, 09.06.2009:
Show 7 quoted lines
> Markus Heidelberg <markus.heidelberg@web.de> writes: > > > > My mail "[PATCH 0/6] fixes for git-send-email" had an empty blurb > > section because it didn't need any additional description. > > I wouldn't want git to refuse sending it. > > I actually wouldn't have wanted to see that [0/6] with empty description.
I thought the diffstat is a nice overview as well. So there is at least some value in a blurb-less cover letter. But I guess they are debatable.
> If the list of 6 patch titles give clear enough description of the theme > of the whole series, you would not need [0/6] to set the stage,
I prefer --thread --no-chain-reply-to for more than 2 patches, so it seems I sometimes only abuse the 0/X as a common anchor for 1..X/X. I'd find it strange to use 1/X for that.
> and that is the best kind of series.
Hmm, so then you prefer no 0/X at all.