Re: [StGit PATCH] Add a --tree flag to stg push
- From
Karl Hasselström <kha@treskal.com>
- Date
- May 19, 2009, 08:03 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20090519080338.GB8451@diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk>
- In-Reply-To
- <87d4a5fs59.fsf@krank.kagedal.org>
On 2009-05-19 09:50:26 +0200, David Kågedal wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> Karl Hasselström <kha@treskal.com> writes: > > > There's no sign-off. > > I counted on getting comments, so it's not finished yet...
The sign-off has nothing to do with the patch being finished. It's simply you saying "I promise I have the right to distribute the following patch under GPLv2." See Documentation/SubmittingPatches (which we've stolen from git and hardly changed).
> > --set-tree maybe? > > Probably better. But perhaps there is a way to not have to talk > about "trees" at all?
Hmm, maybe. Personally, I find that "tree" is a very descriptive word for this operation, but that may be because I know git too well.
Something like "overwrite" maybe?
--
Karl Hasselström, kha@treskal.com
www.treskal.com/kalle