From: Karl Hasselström <kha@treskal.com>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 08:03:38 GMT
Subject: Re: [StGit PATCH] Add a --tree flag to stg push
Message-ID: <20090519080338.GB8451@diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <87d4a5fs59.fsf@krank.kagedal.org>

On 2009-05-19 09:50:26 +0200, David Kågedal wrote:

> Karl Hasselström <kha@treskal.com> writes:
>
> > There's no sign-off.
>
> I counted on getting comments, so it's not finished yet...

The sign-off has nothing to do with the patch being finished. It's
simply you saying "I promise I have the right to distribute the
following patch under GPLv2." See Documentation/SubmittingPatches
(which we've stolen from git and hardly changed).

> > --set-tree maybe?
>
> Probably better. But perhaps there is a way to not have to talk
> about "trees" at all?

Hmm, maybe. Personally, I find that "tree" is a very descriptive word
for this operation, but that may be because I know git too well.

Something like "overwrite" maybe?

-- 
Karl Hasselström, kha@treskal.com
      www.treskal.com/kalle