Re: [StGit PATCH] Add a --tree flag to stg push
- From
Karl Hasselström <kha@treskal.com>
- Date
- May 19, 2009, 07:25 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20090519072512.GA8451@diana.vm.bytemark.co.uk>
- In-Reply-To
- <20090518144754.30487.84132.stgit@krank>
On 2009-05-18 16:50:18 +0200, David Kågedal wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> This scratches a long-time itch for me. The typical use case is when > you want to break up a larg patch inte smaller ones. You back out > the orignal patch, apply a small set of changes from it and then > push the patch back again. But then you don't want to do a merge, > with the possibility of conflict. You simply want to restore to the > tree that the patch had before so you can see what's left to create > cleaned-up patches of. The command "stg push --tree" does just that.
Thanks!
There's no sign-off.
> The naming of flags and functions isn't very obvious, and > suggestions for improvements are welcome.
--set-tree maybe?
> t/t1207-push-tree.sh | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
A test! Very good.
> + opt('--tree', action = 'store_true',
> + short = 'Push the patch with the original tree')This probably deserves a long description as well. (That most existing options lack them is unfortunate---the support for long descriptions was added rather recently.)
Show 7 quoted lines
> + if any(getattr(cd, a) != getattr(orig_cd, a) for a in > + ['parent', 'tree', 'author', 'message']): > + comm = self.__stack.repository.commit(cd) > + self.head = comm > + else: > + comm = None > + s = ' (unmodified)'
Shouldn't self.head be set in both cases?
> +# Copyright (c) 2006 David Kågedal
Been sitting on this patch long? :-)
Show 5 quoted lines
> +# don't need this repo, but better not drop it, see t1100 > +#rm -rf .git > + > +# Need a repo to clone > +test_create_repo foo
Umm, your test doesn't seem to depend on using this separate repo instead of the default one.
--
Karl Hasselström, kha@treskal.com
www.treskal.com/kalle