Re: [PATCH 1/3] git remote update: Report error for non-existing groups
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Apr 8, 2009, 17:08 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20090408170844.GB28069@coredump.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vy6ubo8tn.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 01:20:36AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> I don't know what users want to see when they say "default" explicitly > without having an explicit configuration. Should it do the same thing as > "git remote update"?
I'm not sure we have a choice anymore; is it worth breaking compatibility to "fix" something that doesn't actually seem to be harming anyone?
-Peff