Re: [PATCH 1/3] git remote update: Report error for non-existing groups
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Apr 8, 2009, 18:48 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7v1vs3nfqm.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20090408170844.GB28069@coredump.intra.peff.net>
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
Show 9 quoted lines
> On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 01:20:36AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> I don't know what users want to see when they say "default" explicitly >> without having an explicit configuration. Should it do the same thing as >> "git remote update"? > > I'm not sure we have a choice anymore; is it worth breaking > compatibility to "fix" something that doesn't actually seem to be > harming anyone?
Nope. I do not use the "remote update" myself to begin with, and I somehow suspect that the reason it does not seem to be harming anyone is because nobody sane uses these "remote groups".
Anyway, I took the patch as-is already.