From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2009 17:08:45 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] git remote update: Report error for non-existing groups
Message-ID: <20090408170844.GB28069@coredump.intra.peff.net>
In-Reply-To: <7vy6ubo8tn.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>

On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 01:20:36AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> I don't know what users want to see when they say "default" explicitly
> without having an explicit configuration.  Should it do the same thing as
> "git remote update"?

I'm not sure we have a choice anymore; is it worth breaking
compatibility to "fix" something that doesn't actually seem to be
harming anyone?

-Peff