Re: orthogonal cases of log --date option
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Mar 6, 2009, 12:09 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20090306120916.GA3437@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vmybzw3el.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 10:50:42PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> > Because from the user's perspective --foo={bar,baz,bleep} is about
> > selecting exactly one of {bar,baz,bleep}.
>
> I do not feel very strongly about this either way, and without any prior
> end user "Huh?" input, I would probably have argued like you myself, but
> I saw the original message from Miles about giving more than one --date
> and getting perplexed to see that it did not work, so...Interesting. I saw the original message from Miles as "I tried to use more than one --date, but that seems wrong to me because these concepts are orthogonal". But I do recognize that it is somewhat a matter of perception and style.
Anyway, as our one user in this thread, he has said the separate option is more clear. So I think we should go with that.
-Peff