Re: [PATCH v3] parse-opt: migrate builtin-ls-files.
- From
Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org>
- Date
- Feb 14, 2009, 12:16 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20090214121631.GG4371@genesis.frugalware.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vljtdw961.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 07:16:38PM -0800, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
Show 11 quoted lines
> Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org> writes: > > > Was this dropped on the floor by accident? > > I am not fundamentally opposed to the parseopt conversion, but I was > somewhat discouraged from taking another one, after we got burned by the > one that converted git-apply without much visible gain but with a new bug. > > Because ls-files is a plumbing, it has somewhat lower priority for user > friendliness than any other patches currently in-flight on the list; hence > it has been backburnered. It still is kept in my Inbox.
I'm just asking again as I see the parseopt patch for builtin-config now on the list.
Should I just resend this patch after v1.6.2?