From: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org>
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 12:16:31 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] parse-opt: migrate builtin-ls-files.
Message-ID: <20090214121631.GG4371@genesis.frugalware.org>
In-Reply-To: <7vljtdw961.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>

On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 07:16:38PM -0800, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org> writes:
> 
> > Was this dropped on the floor by accident?
> 
> I am not fundamentally opposed to the parseopt conversion, but I was
> somewhat discouraged from taking another one, after we got burned by the
> one that converted git-apply without much visible gain but with a new bug.
> 
> Because ls-files is a plumbing, it has somewhat lower priority for user
> friendliness than any other patches currently in-flight on the list; hence
> it has been backburnered.  It still is kept in my Inbox.

I'm just asking again as I see the parseopt patch for builtin-config now
on the list.

Should I just resend this patch after v1.6.2?