Re: [PATCH] gitweb: suggest name for OPML view
- From
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jan 10, 2009, 19:45 UTC
- Message-ID
- <200901102045.57589.jnareb@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <cb7bb73a0901101115i541f0911o42f08fc47820fb82@mail.gmail.com>
Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:
Show 18 quoted lines
> On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 9:10 AM, Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Fri, 2 Jan 2009, Giuseppe Bilotta wrote: >> >>> Suggest opml.xml as name for OPML view by providing the appropriate >>> header, consistently with similar usage in project_index view. >> >> It is not name for a view, but more of default filename when saving >> it. While it is good idea to have consistency, I guess that while >> 'project_index' view and other non-HTML views are meant to be >> downloaded and saved (snapshots, patches, patchsets), OPML view >> is meant to be used on-line, just like web feeds in RSS and Atom >> formats which are non-HTML too but do not have Content-Disposition >> header set. > > OPML is used for import/export of RSS feed lists between aggregators > (e.g. moving your reading list from knewsreader to google reader). As > such, it can also be comfortable to save it to disk for import by some > tools. IMO, of course. [...]
If it is used in such way, then I am all for it (and of course for consistency with 'projects_index' view).
Acked-by: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
-- Jakub Narebski Poland