From: Jakub Narebski Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 19:45:56 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] gitweb: suggest name for OPML view Message-ID: <200901102045.57589.jnareb@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Giuseppe Bilotta wrote: > On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 9:10 AM, Jakub Narebski wrote: >> On Fri, 2 Jan 2009, Giuseppe Bilotta wrote: >> >>> Suggest opml.xml as name for OPML view by providing the appropriate >>> header, consistently with similar usage in project_index view. >> >> It is not name for a view, but more of default filename when saving >> it. While it is good idea to have consistency, I guess that while >> 'project_index' view and other non-HTML views are meant to be >> downloaded and saved (snapshots, patches, patchsets), OPML view >> is meant to be used on-line, just like web feeds in RSS and Atom >> formats which are non-HTML too but do not have Content-Disposition >> header set. > > OPML is used for import/export of RSS feed lists between aggregators > (e.g. moving your reading list from knewsreader to google reader). As > such, it can also be comfortable to save it to disk for import by some > tools. IMO, of course. [...] If it is used in such way, then I am all for it (and of course for consistency with 'projects_index' view). Acked-by: Jakub Narebski -- Jakub Narebski Poland