Re: [PATCH] Builtin-commit: show on which branch a commit was added
- From
Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
- Date
- Oct 1, 2008, 15:44 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20081001154425.GE21310@spearce.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20081001154205.GD4962@coredump.intra.peff.net>
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:
Show 12 quoted lines
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 08:36:37AM -0700, Shawn O. Pearce wrote: > > > *sigh* And I just took up the #@*#@!&!*!@ paintbrush myself. > > Dammit. I'm putting it down now. Really. :-) > > Heh. I don't want to stir up trouble or drag you into a discussion you > don't want to be in. But it seems like you are saying "OK, this is > silly, let's just go with what is in next." But I think Andreas raised a > good point about "stuff the user should check should go on the left" > which is not consistent with what is in next. So I just want to confirm > that you either disagree with that, or simply think it is not important > enough to keep the discussion going.
I agree with "important stuff on the left". So as much as I'd like to just move on, I guess I'm willing to look at a 3rd patch that moves the branch name onto the left side.
-- Shawn.