Re: [PATCH] Builtin-commit: show on which branch a commit was added
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Oct 1, 2008, 15:42 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20081001154205.GD4962@coredump.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <20081001153637.GC21310@spearce.org>
On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 08:36:37AM -0700, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> I briefly considered a format like this while replying above, but > at prior day-job I used rather long branch names (sometimes with > common prefixes) so it would truncate alot: > > normal case > On i386 abc9056 (i386: Snib the sprock)
I don't like this purely for the reason that it wastes horizontal space, which is one of the problems that started this discussion.
Also, there is no verb, which I think is worse. :)
> *sigh* And I just took up the #@*#@!&!*!@ paintbrush myself. > Dammit. I'm putting it down now. Really. :-)
Heh. I don't want to stir up trouble or drag you into a discussion you don't want to be in. But it seems like you are saying "OK, this is silly, let's just go with what is in next." But I think Andreas raised a good point about "stuff the user should check should go on the left" which is not consistent with what is in next. So I just want to confirm that you either disagree with that, or simply think it is not important enough to keep the discussion going.
-Peff