Re: git blame not respecting --find-copies-harder ?
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Jul 31, 2008, 10:33 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20080731103351.GA22895@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <20080731102223.GD12867@artemis.madism.org>
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 12:22:23PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> > [Pierre, you have the bogus MFT header that people are often complaining > > about. Either I have to do extra work to fix the headers, or more people > > end up in the To: field. I don't personally care about the latter, but > > it seems that others organize their mail based on To versus Cc] > > [ err if you do a list reply, nobody ends up in To:... but oh well I > can probably remove it, it'll just make my own mutt git folder > awkwardly colorized. ]
I can't do a list reply, as mutt sees no list (and I didn't bother setting up a 'subscribe' variable, since I didn't want to generate MFTs in the first place). However, I just realized that mutt has an honor_followup_to, which will do what I want (AFAICT, there is no point in honoring MFT when using the conventions of this mailing list).
But I wonder if it is as simple in other clients.
-Peff