From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 10:33:52 GMT
Subject: Re: git blame not respecting --find-copies-harder ?
Message-ID: <20080731103351.GA22895@sigill.intra.peff.net>
In-Reply-To: <20080731102223.GD12867@artemis.madism.org>

On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 12:22:23PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:

> > [Pierre, you have the bogus MFT header that people are often complaining
> > about. Either I have to do extra work to fix the headers, or more people
> > end up in the To: field. I don't personally care about the latter, but
> > it seems that others organize their mail based on To versus Cc]
> 
>   [  err if you do a list reply, nobody ends up in To:... but oh well I
>      can probably remove it, it'll just make my own mutt git folder
>      awkwardly colorized.  ]

I can't do a list reply, as mutt sees no list (and I didn't bother
setting up a 'subscribe' variable, since I didn't want to generate MFTs
in the first place). However, I just realized that mutt has an
honor_followup_to, which will do what I want (AFAICT, there is no point
in honoring MFT when using the conventions of this mailing list).

But I wonder if it is as simple in other clients.

-Peff