Re: why is git destructive by default? (i suggest it not be!)
- From
Steven Walter <stevenrwalter@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jun 24, 2008, 22:21 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20080624222105.GA24549@dervierte>
- In-Reply-To
- <willow-jeske-01l61=64jMFEDjCiBE>
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 08:04:30PM -0000, David Jeske wrote:
> I'm not talking about switching "git reset --hard" to "git reset -f". I'm > talking about requiring a "-f" option to "git reset --hard" when it would > destroy or dangle information.
I think you're asking for something like the following...
-- -Steven Walter <stevenrwalter@gmail.com> Freedom is the freedom to say that 2 + 2 = 4 B2F1 0ECC E605 7321 E818 7A65 FC81 9777 DC28 9E8F