Re: [PATCH] Configure test for FREAD_READS_DIRECTORIES
- From
- Michal Rokos <michal.rokos@nextsoft.cz>
- Date
- Mar 4, 2008, 11:48 UTC
- Message-ID
- <200803041248.54197.michal.rokos@nextsoft.cz>
- In-Reply-To
- <7v7igi911y.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
Hello,
On Tuesday 04 March 2008 12:32:57 Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 11 quoted lines
> Michal Rokos <michal.rokos@nextsoft.cz> writes: > >> On how many different platforms was this configure check tested on? > > > > Test works on Linux (no FREAD_READS_DIRECTORIES) and HPUXes > > (FREAD_READS_DIRECTORIES): HP-UX B.11.23 ia64 (Itanium) and HP-UX B.11.11 > > 9000/800 (PaRisc) > > > > Do you want me to resend with "."? > > Probably resending with "." and asking the list audiences for help in > testing would help you gather success reports on different platforms.
Will do... Did that.
Do you think that there's some reason not-to merge it? I mean if fopen(".") throws an error, FREAD_READS_DIRECTORIES will NOT be defined - as is it now.
I don't know how many people cares about configure script since there are missing bits in it again and again. I believe it could receive good amount of testing only when it's merged in.
I'm trying to make GIT working on HPUX - next patch in my queue is about broken vsnprintf() that returns -1 on maxsize overrun. Do you think that it's more likely that patch will be accepted when I omit "broken vsnprintf()" detection code from configure.ac?
MR
-- Michal Rokos NextSoft s.r.o. Vyskočilova 1/1410 140 21 Praha 4 phone: +420 267 224 311 fax: +420 267 224 307 mobile: +420 736 646 591 e-mail: michal.rokos@nextsoft.cz