Re: [PATCH] gitweb: Use the config file to set repository owner's name.
- From
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
- Date
- Feb 8, 2008, 15:33 UTC
- Message-ID
- <200802081633.55934.jnareb@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20080208143027.GA707@c3sl.ufpr.br>
I have joined the two emails to reply only once.
On Fri, 8 Feb 2008, Bruno Cesar Ribas wrote:
Show 20 quoted lines
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 02:55:33AM -0800, Jakub Narebski wrote:
>> Bruno Ribas <ribas@c3sl.ufpr.br> writes:
>>>
>>> diff --git a/gitweb/gitweb.perl b/gitweb/gitweb.perl
>>> index 8ef2735..e8a43b7 100755
>>> --- a/gitweb/gitweb.perl
>>> +++ b/gitweb/gitweb.perl
>>> @@ -1767,7 +1767,12 @@ sub git_get_project_owner {
>>> if (exists $gitweb_project_owner->{$project}) {
>>> $owner = $gitweb_project_owner->{$project};
>>> }
>>> - if (!defined $owner) {
>>> +
>>> + if (!defined $owner){
>>> + $owner = git_get_project_config('owner');
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + if (!$owner) {
>>> $owner = get_file_owner("$projectroot/$project");
>>> }Another comment: why did you change from checking of "!defined $owner" to checking "!$owner"? git_get_project_config('owner') returns undef if gitweb.owner is not defined. With checking for defined we can avoid false positives of owner being "0" (in practice I think this does not matter) or "" (this could happen if somebody doesn't want for project to have owner shown).
Show 5 quoted lines
>> First, I think the empty lines added are not needed. > > I made those empty lines because original code had same empty lines > above, I just let it to have same pattern, but I can remove. Should I > remove?!
The idea was for empty lines to separate blocks of code: variables declaration, initialization, finding an owner, and return value. So I think that empty lines are not needed here. There were no empty lines between check for owner in the structure populated by git_get_project_list_from_file() and checking filesystem stat for project directory owner.
By the way, the git_get_project_list_from_file() interface is a bit strange...
> I that last 3lines should be inside the block that we call > git_get_project_config, don't you think?
No. I think using "if (!defined $foo) { maybe define foo }..." sequence is a good flow.
> I'll resend [...] with $git_dir set.
And with signoff corrected, I assume?
Please try to check if the code works with and without gitweb.owner set before sending new version of the patch...
-- Jakub Narebski Poland